AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA GeForce 6200 X2 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 256MB VRAM GeForce 6200 X2 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 3.200GB/s)
1440 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Jan 2008
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 6 PCI
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
200 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
3.200GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
-
72
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
560.0 MPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.120 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
Unknown
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DMS-59
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
NV44
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
110 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
110 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.4
OpenGL
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
3.0
