Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCI

AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 520 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1392 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCI 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Lower TDP (29W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350 +1192%
2.016 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 520 PCI
0.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Apr 2011
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

18
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
1440
Shading Units
48
72
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.620 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.480 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
155.5 GFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
12.96 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
29W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
GF119
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
GF119-300-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy