AMD FireStream 9350 vs Intel Arc Pro A60
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 12GB VRAM Arc Pro A60 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Pro A60 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A60
+316%
8.397 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Jun 2023
FireStream
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
2048
72
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
256
-
RT Cores
16
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
131.2 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
262.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
16.79 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.397 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
130W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
DG2-256
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G12
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
11.5 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
269 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
