AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Lower TDP (49W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
+649%
2.016 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 620
0.269 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
May 2012
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
1440
Shading Units
96
72
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
49W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
GF108
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
GF108-100-KB-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.0
Shader Model
5.1
