Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690

AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 690 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1019MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 690 +55%
3.13 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
May 2012
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1019 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
18
Compute Units
-
1440
Shading Units
1536
72
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.61 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
130.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.130 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
130.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
GK104
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
GK104-355-A2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
3x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy