Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 980 Ti to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Boost Clock1076MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
1376 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 980 Ti +200%
6.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Jun 2015
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1076 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
336.6GB/s

Render Config

18
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
2816
72
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
103.3 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
189.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.060 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
189.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
GM200
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
GM200-310-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
8 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
601 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy