Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 320W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
8288 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4080 +2317%
48.74 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Sep 2022
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2205 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6X
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
716.8GB/s

Render Config

18
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
76
1440
Shading Units
9728
72
TMUs
304
32
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
280.6 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
761.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
48.74 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
48.74 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
761.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
320W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
AD103
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
AD103-300-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy