Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM

AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
1056 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 170W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.3GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350 +59%
2.016 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
1.263 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Mar 2011
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.3GB/s

Render Config

18
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
1440
Shading Units
384
72
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.17 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.67 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1263 GFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
105.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
170W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
GF114
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
GF114-400-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy