Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD Radeon Pro V520

AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD Radeon Pro V520

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V520 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
AMD Radeon Pro V520 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
864 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V520 +265%
7.373 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Dec 2020
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
18
Compute Units
36
1440
Shading Units
2304
72
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.4 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.75 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.373 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
460.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Navi 12
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
Navi 12
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
Unknown
334 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

150W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy