AMD FireStream 9350 vs Intel Arc Pro A50
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
416 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2350MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A50
+138%
4.813 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Aug 2022
FireStream
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
1024
72
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
DG2-128
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
