Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega II Duo to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 475W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1720MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1020GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
2656 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega II Duo +598%
14.09 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Jun 2019
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Apple MPX

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1400 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1720 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1020GB/s

Render Config

18
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
4096
72
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.1 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
440.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.18 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.09 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.045 TFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
475W
450 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 4x Thunderbolt
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Vega 20
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
Vega 20 XT
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy