Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2150MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
3680 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6900X +992%
22.02 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Aug 2021
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2150 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

18
Compute Units
80
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
5120
72
TMUs
320
32
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
80
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
275.2 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
688.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.03 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.02 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1376 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Navi 21
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy