Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7500

AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7500

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7500 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
352 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7500 +504%
12.19 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Aug 2023
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1344 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
172.0GB/s

Render Config

18
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
1792
72
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
28
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.8 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
190.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.37 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.19 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
380.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
70W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Navi 33
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
Navi 33
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
13.3 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
204 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy