Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM

AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1120 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350 +304%
2.016 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 240 OEM
0.499 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Nov 2013
FireStream
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
730 MHz
-
Boost Clock
780 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
18
Compute Units
5
1440
Shading Units
320
72
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Oland
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy