AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD Radeon R7 265
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
416 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
+6%
2.016 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265
1.894 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Feb 2014
FireStream
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
1024
72
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO
(215-0828062)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1
