Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD Radeon RX 6400

AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD Radeon RX 6400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 6400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
672 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 6400 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2321MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (53W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6400 +76%
3.565 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Jan 2022
FireStream
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1923 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2321 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

18
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
768
72
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.27 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.130 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.565 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
222.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
53W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Navi 24
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL (215-135000046)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy