Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX

AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 24GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XTX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 355W)
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX 's Advantages
Boost Clock3300MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
4704 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7950 XTX +3922%
81.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Unknown
FireStream
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
3300 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s

Render Config

18
Compute Units
96
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
6144
72
TMUs
384
32
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
96
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
96 MB

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
633.6 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1267 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
162.2 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.10 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
355W
450 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Navi 31
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XTX+
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy