Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada

AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
16736 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
RTX 6000 Ada +4416%
91.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Dec 2022
FireStream
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s

Render Config

18
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
142
1440
Shading Units
18176
72
TMUs
568
32
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
AD102
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
AD102
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy