Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM

AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 205 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1424 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350 +4380%
2.016 TFLOPS
GeForce 205 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Nov 2009
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

18
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
1440
Shading Units
16
72
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
31W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
GT218
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
GT218-200-B1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy