Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB

AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 4GB VRAM T400 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
1056 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T400 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350 +84%
2.016 TFLOPS
T400 4 GB
1.094 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
May 2021
FireStream
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
420 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
6
18
Compute Units
-
1440
Shading Units
384
72
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
TU117
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy