AMD FireStream 9370 vs ATI FireMV 2250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 225W)
Score
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Jan 2007
FireStream
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
-
80
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
225W
TDP
32W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
RV516
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.4
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
3.0
