Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9370 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

AMD FireStream 9370 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
192 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
Lower TDP (125W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9370
2.64 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER +90%
5.027 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Oct 2019
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
1600
Shading Units
1408
80
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
125W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
TU116
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
TU116-300-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy