AMD FireStream 9370 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 141.7GB/s)
1360 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 236W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9370
+324%
2.64 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 280
0.622 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Jun 2008
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1107 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
141.7GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
1600
Shading Units
240
80
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.26 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.16 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
236W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
GT200
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
G200-300-A2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.0
Shader Model
4.0
