AMD FireStream 9370 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock1098MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9370
+25%
2.64 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
2.108 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Unknown
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1033 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
960
80
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.96 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.108 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.84 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
GK106
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.0
Shader Model
5.1
