AMD FireStream 9370 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1072MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9370
+6%
2.64 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 760 X2
2.47 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Nov 2013
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1006 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1072 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
1152
80
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.73 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.9 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.470 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
102.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
3x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
GK104
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
GK104-225-A2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.0
Shader Model
5.1
