AMD FireStream 9370 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2080 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1710MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (215W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9370
2.64 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 2080
+281%
10.07 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Sep 2018
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 20
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1515 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1710 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
46
1600
Shading Units
2944
80
TMUs
184
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
368
-
RT Cores
46
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
109.4 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
314.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.14 TFLOPS
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.07 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
314.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
215W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
TU104
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
TU104-400A-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
