AMD FireStream 9370 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 and 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 450W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.01TB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
14784 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9370
2.64 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4090
+3028%
82.58 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Sep 2022
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2235 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6X
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
1.01TB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
128
1600
Shading Units
16384
80
TMUs
512
32
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
128
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
443.5 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1290 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
82.58 TFLOPS
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
82.58 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1290 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
450W
550 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
AD102
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
AD102-300-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.8
