Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU Mobile

We compared a Desktop platform GPU: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI and a Integrated graphics card GPU: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1100MHz
752 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 31W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU Mobile +4728%
1.69 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2009
Release Date
Sep 2020
GeForce 200
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Desktop
Type
Integrated
PCI
Bus Interface
Ring Bus

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
System Shared
DDR2
Memory Type
System Shared
64bit
Memory Bus
System Shared
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.900 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
3.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.379 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.690 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
422.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
Tiger Lake GT2
-
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
Unknown
100 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Board Design

31W
TDP
15W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy