NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI and 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 1000W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 15 years late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
19440 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI325X
+233385%
81.72 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Oct 2024
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
288GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM3e
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
304
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
19456
8
TMUs
1216
4
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
1.900 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
3.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2553.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
1000W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
153 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
N/A
