Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 vs AMD FirePro W4300

NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 vs AMD FirePro W4300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 Rev. 2 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 50W)
AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 210 Rev. 2
0.039 TFLOPS
FirePro W4300 +3561%
1.428 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2009
Release Date
Dec 2015
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
12
16
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.64 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1428 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.28 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Bonaire
GT218-325-B1
GPU Variant
Bonaire PRO GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Board Design

31W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy