Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 100W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1264 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +11223%
4.416 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2009
Release Date
Nov 2019
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1725 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
20
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
1280
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.20 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
138.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.832 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.416 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
138.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
TU116
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
TU116-250-KA-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Board Design

31W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy