Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 80W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
880 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +7205%
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2009
Release Date
Jul 2020
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
14
16
Shading Units
896
8
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

31W
TDP
80W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
TU116
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy