Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (31W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
200 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 +1274%
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2009
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
448bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
27
16
Shading Units
216
8
TMUs
72
4
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

31W
TDP
182W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
GT200
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy