Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X

NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 750W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 15 years late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
19440 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI325X +209438%
81.72 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2009
Release Date
Oct 2024
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Instinct(MIx)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
288GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM3e
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
304
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
19456
8
TMUs
1216
4
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2554 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS

Board Design

31W
TDP
750W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1150 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
153 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy