Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 85W)
AMD Radeon Pro 5300 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1264 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5300 +10730%
4.224 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2009
Release Date
Aug 2020
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
1280
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.448 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.224 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
264.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

31W
TDP
85W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Navi 14
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XE
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy