CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 210
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
496 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3100
+3100%
1.248 TFLOPS
GeForce 210
VS
Radeon Pro WX 3100
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Jun 2017
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
925 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
8
16
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
Lexa
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
Lexa XT
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²
Board Design
31W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
2
NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 OEM
3
NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs ATI Radeon HD 5450
4
NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
5
Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210
6
NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
7
AMD Radeon Pro V7300X vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
8
NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs ATI Radeon HD 4350 PCIe x1
9
NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT
10
NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Related News
1
Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time
2
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
3
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
4
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
5
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
6
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
7
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
8
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
9
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
10
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy