Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs ATI Radeon X1650

NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs ATI Radeon X1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
16 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2009
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
-
8
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.540 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.540 GTexel/s
-
-
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-

Board Design

31W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
RV516
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
40 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.105 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy