Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs Intel Arc A770

NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs Intel Arc A770

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 310 OEM and 16GB VRAM Arc A770 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 225W)
Intel Arc A770 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
4080 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 310 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
Arc A770 +43588%
19.66 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2009
Release Date
Oct 2022
GeForce 300
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2100 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
333 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
5.328GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
4096
8
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.356 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
307.2 GPixel/s
4.712 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
614.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.32 TFLOPS
44.86 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.66 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.458 TFLOPS

Board Design

31W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
DG2-512
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy