Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO

NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 310 OEM and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (6.400GB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
24 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 31W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 310 OEM +7%
0.045 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
0.042 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2009
Release Date
Jun 2007
GeForce 300
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
333 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
5.328GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
40
8
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.356 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.100 GPixel/s
4.712 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.100 GTexel/s
-
-
-
44.86 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
42.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

31W
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
RV610
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
RV610 LE (215LKCAKA14FG)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy