Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 310 OEM and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6800 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2320MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
3824 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 310 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6800 +39500%
17.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2009
Release Date
Jun 2021
GeForce 300
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2075 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2320 MHz
333 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
5.328GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
60
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
3840
8
TMUs
240
4
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
60
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.356 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
222.7 GPixel/s
4.712 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
556.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
35.64 TFLOPS
44.86 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.82 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1114 GFLOPS

Board Design

31W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Navi 21
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy