CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 6300
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 6300
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM
AMD Radeon RX 6300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 310 OEM and 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 32W)
AMD Radeon RX 6300 's Advantages
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 310 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6300
+6862%
3.133 TFLOPS
GeForce 310 OEM
VS
Radeon RX 6300
Graphics Card
Nov 2009
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 300
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
333 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
32bit
5.328GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.356 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
4.712 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
44.86 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
32W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
2x HDMI 2.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
Navi 24
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition
2
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 6800
3
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 4730
4
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP
5
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs AMD FirePro S9170
6
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM
7
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
8
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 OEM
9
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
10
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GTX
Related News
1
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
2
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
3
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
4
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
5
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
6
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
7
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
8
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
9
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
10
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy