Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 310M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS

NVIDIA GeForce 310M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 310M and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9200M GS to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 310M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
8 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (11.20GB/s vs 10.67GB/s)
Lower TDP (13W vs 14W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 310M +122%
0.049 TFLOPS
GeForce 9200M GS
0.022 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce 300M
Generation
GeForce 9M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
667 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
10.67GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
8
8
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.424 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
4.848 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.200 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
48.96 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.40 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
G98
N11M-GE1
GPU Variant
NB9M-GE
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Board Design

14W
TDP
13W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
1.1
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy