Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 310M vs AMD Radeon E9550 MXM

NVIDIA GeForce 310M vs AMD Radeon E9550 MXM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 310M and 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 310M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (14W vs 95W)
AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1266MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 10.67GB/s)
2288 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 310M
0.049 TFLOPS
Radeon E9550 MXM +11806%
5.834 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Sep 2016
GeForce 300M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1120 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1266 MHz
667 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
10.67GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
36
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
2304
8
TMUs
144
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.424 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.51 GPixel/s
4.848 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
182.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.834 TFLOPS
48.96 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.834 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
364.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

14W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Ellesmere
N11M-GE1
GPU Variant
Ellesmere XT
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy