Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 310M vs AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce 310M vs AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 310M and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 310M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (14W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.3GB/s vs 10.67GB/s)
2032 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 310M
0.049 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition +7006%
3.482 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Nov 2014
GeForce 300M
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
667 MHz
Memory Clock
1362 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
10.67GB/s
Bandwidth
174.3GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
2048
8
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.424 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
4.848 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.482 TFLOPS
48.96 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
217.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

14W
TDP
250W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Amethyst
N11M-GE1
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
5 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy