Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 310M vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce 310M vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 310M and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 310M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (14W vs 120W)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2115MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 10.67GB/s)
9712 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 310M
0.049 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation +83879%
41.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 300M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1425 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2115 MHz
667 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
10.67GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
76
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
9728
8
TMUs
304
4
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.424 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
236.9 GPixel/s
4.848 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
643.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
41.15 TFLOPS
48.96 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
41.15 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
643.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
AD103
N11M-GE1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Board Design

14W
TDP
120W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy