Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 2400

NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 2400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 315 OEM and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (9.600GB/s vs 7.920GB/s)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 's Advantages
24 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 33W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 315 OEM +40%
0.045 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2400
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Feb 2008
GeForce 300
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
600 MHz
Memory Clock
495 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
7.920GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
2
16
Shading Units
40
8
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.356 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.592 GPixel/s
4.712 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.592 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
44.86 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.84 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
RV610
GT218-300-B1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Board Design

33W
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy