Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 315 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2150MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
5104 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6900X +48833%
22.02 TFLOPS
GeForce 315 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Feb 2011
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
5120
Shading Units
16
320
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
4
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

275.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
688.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
44.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
1376 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
33W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
GT218
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
GPU Variant
GT218-300-B1
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.5
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy