Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 315 OEM and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 315 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power +3962%
1.828 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Mar 2016
GeForce 300
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1026 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.356 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
4.712 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
44.86 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
GM206
GT218-300-B1
GPU Variant
GM206-251-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Board Design

33W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
5.2
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy