Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO

NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 315 OEM and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 PRO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Lower TDP (33W vs 200W)
ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 315 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2900 PRO +753%
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Dec 2007
GeForce 300
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
600 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
4
16
Shading Units
320
8
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.356 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
4.712 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.600 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
44.86 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
R600
GT218-300-B1
GPU Variant
R600 PRO (215RGMDKA13FG)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Board Design

33W
TDP
200W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy