NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs ATI Radeon 3100 Mobile IGP
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon 3100 Mobile IGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
8 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
+225%
0.091 TFLOPS
Radeon 3100 Mobile IGP
0.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Aug 2008
GeForce 300M
Generation
TeraScale IGP
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
4
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
40
16
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.400 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
91.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
28.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
23W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
C89
GPU Name
RS780
MCP89
GPU Variant
RS780M
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
-
-
-
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.1
